“Because the Bible says so” will not answer somebody who is still deciding whether the Bible deserves trust. It asks the person to accept the conclusion before examining the evidence.

A better conversation starts one step earlier. What can we know about Jesus? How early are the reports about Him? What did He claim? What happened after His crucifixion that made frightened followers announce that He was alive?

Those questions leave room for honest disagreement. They also keep the conversation centered on Jesus.

First, define “Son of God”

Some people hear the phrase and imagine that Christians believe God physically fathered a child with Mary. That is not what the New Testament means.

The title has roots in Israel's royal and Messianic language. In the Gospel accounts it also describes Jesus' unique relationship with the Father. Peter calls Him “the Christ, the Son of the living God” (Matthew 16:16). John says his signs were recorded so readers may believe that “Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God” and have life in His name (John 20:30-31).

So the question is specific. Was Jesus the promised Christ, sent by the Father with His authority, whom God raised from the dead?

Read the New Testament as historical material first

A person does not have to begin by calling a document Scripture. Historians routinely read religious, political, and partisan writings as sources. A source can have a purpose and still preserve evidence. The work is to ask when it was written, what earlier material it used, who it names, and how well it explains the events that followed.

Paul's first letter to the Corinthians was written within the first Christian generation. In 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 he passes on a summary he had already received: Jesus died, was buried, was raised, and appeared to named people and groups. A Yale Bible Study guide dates the letter to about AD 56 and identifies this passage as an early formula Paul received.

That does not settle whether the appearances were encounters with the risen Jesus. It does establish that resurrection was central to the message very early. It was not a legend added centuries later.

Use non-Christian sources for what they can show

The Roman historian Tacitus wrote that Christus was executed during the reign of Tiberius by Pontius Pilate and that the movement later reached Rome. You can read the passage in Tacitus, Annals 15.44.

The Jewish historian Josephus refers to James as “the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ” in Antiquities 20.9.1.

Neither writer says Jesus rose or proves that He is the Son of God. That is an important limit. These references support basic historical ground: Jesus was a real person, He was known as Christ among His followers, He was executed, and His movement did not disappear.

Ask what Jesus claimed

The Gospel portraits do not present Jesus as only a wise teacher later misunderstood by His followers.

In Matthew 11:27, Jesus says the Father has entrusted all things to the Son and that no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son reveals Him. In John 10:36, He says plainly that He is God's Son. When the high priest asks whether He is the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One, Jesus answers and speaks of the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power (Mark 14:61-62).

Someone may think the Gospel writers reported those moments inaccurately. That objection deserves discussion. Saying Jesus never made a distinctive claim, however, does not fit the sources we actually have.

The resurrection carries the argument

Christianity does not rest on the thought that Jesus taught beautiful ethics. Its center is the announcement that God raised His Son from the dead.

The earliest witnesses could have been lying. They could have been mistaken. Their experiences could have another explanation. Each proposal has to account for the early testimony, the named witnesses, the proclamation in the generation that knew Jesus, and the movement that formed around a crucified Messiah.

A spreadsheet cannot compel belief in a unique act of God. History can still narrow the question. Read the sources and compare the explanations. If Jesus truly rose, His claims about Himself can no longer be filed beside ordinary religious advice.

Our guide to the resurrection as a historical event takes that evidence one step at a time.

A short answer you can give

You might say:

I do not expect you to accept a Bible verse just because I quote it. We can first read the New Testament writings as early sources about Jesus. They say He claimed to be the Son sent by the Father, was crucified, and appeared alive afterward. Even non-Christian sources confirm His execution and the early movement. Those outside sources do not prove His identity. The real question is what best explains the resurrection testimony. If God raised Jesus from the dead, that gives powerful reason to believe what Jesus said about Himself.

Then stop and listen. Ask which part your friend questions. Do not unload ten arguments when the real concern is one painful experience with a Christian.

Investigate before trying to win

Read Matthew together, followed by John. GotLuv.org offers Matthew in reading, film, and audio formats at no cost. Read 1 Corinthians 15:1-20 as well. Write down disagreements and return to them instead of bluffing.

If you become convinced that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, the New Testament calls for more than winning an argument. Peter told his hearers to repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for forgiveness, with the promise of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:36-38). Jesus calls people to follow Him, take up their cross, love as He loved, and carry His hope into real life.

That life is difficult. It is also full of light. The risen Jesus is worth following.